mp3machine - Re: Which would you choose?

What's New?!

Discussion

Add Listing

Search Site

Articles

Glossary

advertisment

MP3Machine currently offers you over 900 Shareware, Freeware, Demo and Trial MP3 related downloads for Windows, Macintosh, and Linux

Our Sponsors

Site Newsletter

Re: Which would you choose?

Posted by Curious on November 26, 2002 at 23:39:13:

In Reply to: Re: Which would you choose? posted by NeoRenegade on November 25, 2002 at 05:38:12:

: If it was a FastEnc 320kbps file... I might still go with it. Older versions of FastEnc aren't so great, same with some settings on the newer one, but if it was done using the medium setting (not fast or high-quality (high-quality has a stereo collapse bug))... it would be pretty darned good.

Thanks NeoRenegade. How can you tell if it is medium setting versus high quality?

VIEW FOLLOW-UPS | POST A FOLLOW-UP | DISCUSSION FORUM

Follow-ups:

Post a Follow-up:

Name:

E-Mail: (optional)

Subject:

Message: : : If it was a FastEnc 320kbps file... I might still go with it. Older versions of FastEnc aren't so great, same with some settings on the newer one, but if it was done using the medium setting (not fast or high-quality (high-quality has a stereo collapse bug))... it would be pretty darned good. : Thanks NeoRenegade. How can you tell if it is medium setting versus high quality?

Home All content © Copyright Hitsquad Pty. Ltd. 2008 Contact

Hitsquad - Musician's Web Center \| MusicianTutorials.com - Advice and Tutorials for Musicians \| GuitarSite.com - Everything About Guitars \| Shareware Music Machine - The World's Biggest Music Software Site \| MusiciansBooks.com - Books and Magazines for Musicians and the Music Industry \| MusiciansAvailable.com - Find Musicians in Your Local Area \| Musician Discussion Forums