Your complete MP3 software source on the Net

What's New?!

Discussion

Add Listing

Search Site

Articles

Glossary
advertisment
MP3Machine currently offers you over 900 Shareware, Freeware, Demo and Trial MP3 related downloads for Windows, Macintosh, and Linux
 Our Sponsors
Visit zZounds



 Site Newsletter
Subscribe to MP3 Informer weekly newsletter - enter your email address:
 Re: Which would you choose?
Posted by NeoRenegade on November 25, 2002 at 05:38:12:

In Reply to: Which would you choose? posted by Curious on November 23, 2002 at 14:59:08:

I would go with the 320kbps. My reasoning is that, since I actually remember using v3.88, it's tough with LAME to make an MP3 sound at all bad at 320kbps so I'd place the odds of it sounding better than the newer 192kbps MP3 at about 90%.

If it was a FastEnc 320kbps file... I might still go with it. Older versions of FastEnc aren't so great, same with some settings on the newer one, but if it was done using the medium setting (not fast or high-quality (high-quality has a stereo collapse bug))... it would be pretty darned good.

VIEW FOLLOW-UPS | POST A FOLLOW-UP | DISCUSSION FORUM

Follow-ups:

Post a Follow-up:

Name:
E-Mail: (optional)
Subject:
Message:

Home All content © Copyright Hitsquad Pty. Ltd. 2008 Contact
 
Hitsquad - Musician's Web Center | MusicianTutorials.com - Advice and Tutorials for Musicians | GuitarSite.com - Everything About Guitars | Shareware Music Machine - The World's Biggest Music Software Site | MusiciansBooks.com - Books and Magazines for Musicians and the Music Industry | MusiciansAvailable.com - Find Musicians in Your Local Area | Musician Discussion Forums